Download skin ammo spec rf online

In addition to this capability, the interests are furthered in respect to follow-on MUOS satellite builds. In operating parallel to the existing MUOS communications hub controller, a new communications hub controller must be developed under this effort to perform signal processing to access, host and power correct Radio Frequency RF signals as needed for non MUOS waveforms.

As with most network hub receivers, multiple remotes must be handled by a network controller. Time Division Multiple Access TDMA time windows must include guard time, transmission connect time, transmit duration time, and termination time. It is crucial that each remote user, upon access of the communications hub controller, is de-conflicted with the MUOS network. The de-confliction will only be required when the MUOS waveform is present.

The communications hub controller will interface to the existing architecture via RF at the frequency range of L-band. The data will interface with a secure network that requires standard Ethernet data interface packets. The design document should include the strategy, proposed hardware elements, such as Field Programmable Gate Array FPGA components, high-speed multi-FPGA backplane and the standards utilized in accomplishing the tasks to create the communications hub controller.

It is significant to note that expectations of accessing thousands of users simultaneously will require a significant amount of parallel processing. PHASE II: The work to be done in Phase II includes the delivery of the communications hub controller prototype based on the designed developed in Phase I with windows-based management software and standard user documentation.

A phase III strategy should include the means to develop and market to commercial and military entities. These standards allow multiple vendors to provide payload modules for C5ISR systems without the need to build to proprietary interfaces or replace entire systems. This increases competition and reduces the cost and effort required to upgrade C5ISR systems. While OpenVPX is suitable for many military ground and airborne platforms, it is not designed for small size, weight, and power SWaP platforms such as small unmanned aerial and ground vehicles.

To address this gap and provide the benefits of CMOSS to more military programs, this effort will develop initial prototypes implementing open small form factor hardware specifications. Switch and PNT capabilities may be module-based or built into the chassis or equivalent.

Specific prototype performance requirements are not defined. The initial prototype shall be tested in a relevant environment to validate the specifications.

These validation efforts will support further development of the specifications to mature them for transition to CMOSS. This effort will also develop verification requirements for the small form factor hardware specifications. These requirements will define the verification methodology to be used to test hardware for conformance to each specification requirement. In addition, this effort will design and develop a conformance test kit to automate conformance testing to the greatest extent possible.

Conduct trade off studies on the use of existing small form factor hardware standards. Deliver initial open small form factor hardware standards.

Provide an analysis of any performance limitations due to the hardware form factor. PHASE II: Design and develop prototype using the developed standards with a cooling solution, processing and transceiver modules, an Ethernet switch, and shared position, navigation and timing.

Demonstrate the hardware with a relevant representative environment. Develop updated small form factor hardware standards for transition to existing relevant standards body. Develop an initial standards conformance plan and test kit for the small form factor hardware. Develop a payload for small SWaP platforms such as small unmanned aerial vehicles.

Provide conformance testing and conformance test kits for small form factor hardware developers. Grovak, Mark. Ripley, Bill and Wayne McGee. The portable sampler will efficiently ionize atmospheric threats that are biological and chemical in nature.

While traditional processor architectures are very well suited for deterministically processing relatively small data sets in real-time, as the size of the data sets grows, scaling of traditional processors within the constraints of the ground platform SWaP, environment, and cost targets becomes infeasible.

PHASE I: Phase I entails a feasibility study, concept development, theoretical performance analysis, risk analysis, cost analysis and concept design of a probabilistic processor computing platform. The study shall identify candidate processor architecture solutions, describe the pros and cons of each processor architecture, and provide a recommendation for processor selection for the next Phase. The performance analysis shall describe the theoretical worst- and best-case computational throughput and latency for a range of likely scenarios.

The risk and cost analysis shall present multiple options that may reduce risk or cost or provide additional capabilities or performance. The concept design shall provide a detailed technical description of how the recommended processor technology can be integrated into a test bed for performance evaluation. Expected Deliverables: 1 Analytical report performance, risk, cost with conclusions and recommendations 2 Design concept report for the recommended solution PHASE II: Phase II of this effort shall focus on developing a prototype test bed based on the technology described in Phase I with various risk and cost options selected in consultation with the government POC.

The contractor shall develop a prototype test bed to assess the actual performance of the selected processor solution under a range of likely scenarios and computational loads as compared to the theoretical performance documented in Phase I. The causes of any discrepancies between actual and theoretical performance shall be determined and possible solutions shall be identified.

A solution that has wide appeal and relevance to other fields is preferred. The proposed processor computing platform solution will have applicability to facilitate intelligent decision making for survivability, lethality, and mobility missions for ground vehicle platforms in military applications. The commercial utility of this technology applies to autonomous driving assistance capabilities in consumer and commercial vehicle fleets. OBJECTIVE: Develop physics-based modeling and simulation of vehicle components and electronics, including virtual emulation of controllers and other devices, for conducting cybersecurity assessments and vulnerability research.

However, the tools, techniques, and technologies currently utilized in performing these tasks are insufficient and generate substantial risks, costs, and schedule impacts. Many of the issues related to these testing methods can be attributed to their reliance on physical hardware. Accordingly, a solution that develops vehicle cybersecurity simulation technologies will reduce many of the hardware dependencies seen in evaluating a vehicle system during all phases of its lifecycle.

Advanced cybersecurity simulators will also have the added benefit of reducing barriers to entry such as high starting costs and the degree of expertise needed for conducting evaluations. To currently minimize hardware dependency, cybersecurity researchers and engineers are able to evaluate systems by utilizing Hardware-in-the-Loop HIL and Software-in-the-Loop SIL simulators before performing evaluations on physical vehicles. These simulators are capable of emulating hardware and software components, but have their own drawbacks that can diminish their effectiveness in minimizing hardware dependency.

For instance, SIL simulators are designed to run code on simulated hardware representations, based on high-level hardware functions. As such, they are ineffective in simulating hardware and may not provide completely accurate results in software simulations.

Although HIL simulators emulate simple electronics such as sensors and actuators, they generally do not emulate more complex ones and instead require a physical component to interface with.

These drawbacks require extensive evaluations to be performed on physical hardware instead. Many evaluations can be performed in a lab environment using a hardware workstation. This workstation is typically referred to as a test bench setup and incorporates all of the connectors, controllers, and other electronic devices from a vehicle platform.

Evidently, this method also has drawbacks with cost and schedule burdens. Firstly, setups lack flexibility, requiring that each platform variant or vehicle model have its own uniquely tailored test bench. Their cumbersome size and lack of portability alone creates logistical burdens in acquiring, transporting, and storing existing setups.

To address the capability gaps in performing cybersecurity assessments and vulnerability research, advanced simulation technologies would primarily need to be able to: emulate any and all kinds of controllers or other electronic devices with physics-based modeling and simulation, even down at the component level e.

PHASE I: Determine technical feasibility for a software-based solution to simultaneously emulate many vehicle ECUs and other electronics devices of varying complexity e. Additionally, the solution should outline the capability of emulating software and firmware for these virtualized controllers and devices.

Hardware will be virtualized using physics-based modeling and simulation in order to enable the capability of testing for cyber-attacks that utilize the electromagnetic spectrum and other electrical properties, likely drawing on concepts from electromagnetic simulation technology.

Inherently, functionality testing evaluates that a system does what it should while cybersecurity testing evaluates that a system does not do more than it should. This is an important consideration for minimizing the attack surfaces of vehicle systems. As such, the solution should also have the inherent capability of testing for known and unknown functionalities in simulated systems.

Design a concept for the solution with open architecture or open-source principles in mind. This flexibility will enable 3rd-party developed systems and components to be seamlessly integrated into the simulator to facilitate and improve various cybersecurity evaluations.

Possible use cases include: cybersecurity researchers and engineers uploading tools and reproducible cyber-attacks for conducting cybersecurity assessments and vulnerability research, and Original Equipment Manufacturers OEMs uploading their own proprietary controllers and devices in order to conduct cybersecurity evaluations throughout the product development lifecycle. The solution will also outline a common test architecture for integrating known attack scenarios, exploits, and vulnerability scans into the simulator.

A common test architecture will improve turnaround times when evaluating system cyber-resiliency against newly discovered vulnerabilities and exploits. Demonstrate that the solution meets the second major milestone of simulating all hardware-based and software-based systems for a target military platform, such as the Stryker or Joint Light Tactical Vehicle JLTV.

Develop a default library of prevalent hacks, exploits, and cyber-attacks for the simulator. Due to some attacks occurring over a long period of time, the solution must also be capable of simulating systems at different points in time.

Many different kinds of cybersecurity evaluations can be performed during a session simulating vehicle systems. The results of a session should be recorded or inserted in a report produced by the simulator to easily document or share the findings of cybersecurity evaluations.

Sessions should provide metrics on the cyber resiliency of evaluated systems, the details of any vulnerabilities and their severity, the consequences of exploits, and other system information. The solution will demonstrate the capability of generating physics-based models of controllers and devices from preexisting files and schematics such as transistor diagrams and CAD drawings.

An intuitive method of generating models for simulation is necessary for efficiently reevaluating systems after design modifications are made to improve functionality or mitigate existing vulnerabilities. These capabilities will also support the efforts of engineers and developers in evaluating their systems without extensive backgrounds in cybersecurity.

Deliverables should include a prototype of the software-based solution and source-code, simulator tools for fuzzing, glitching, and reproducible cyber-attacks, and reports and demonstrations assessing the full capabilities of the solution. The solution should ultimately be able to conduct cybersecurity evaluations against side-channel and sensor attacks, normally only possible to conduct on physical hardware due to the intricacies and physical properties involved in electronics and the electromagnetic spectrum.

For instance, a side-channel attack is designed to pull critical data from electronics through the analysis of hardware power consumption or leaked electromagnetic waves.

Physics-based modeling and simulation is necessary in order to emulate these attack scenarios and ultimately reduce hardware dependency for conducting cybersecurity evaluations. Through a combination of sophisticated algorithms and automation, tests could be conducted simultaneously on any number of components, including ports, connections, wires, chips, and devices.

Generally, this task is made difficult for even a team of evaluators to perform due to the amount of factors at hand. User training and instructions should be developed to properly utilize this vehicle cybersecurity simulation software. These capabilities would promote the creation of more cyber-resilient systems throughout automotive and defense industries. Automotive companies could easily integrate this simulation technology into their processes for determining the cyber resiliency of their systems.

Since tacking on cybersecurity measures becomes more expensive later on in the product development lifecycle, automotive companies could go as far as to require that their suppliers also utilize this solution to perform cybersecurity evaluations early on in development.

Likewise, Army components such as Project Managers PMs can also implement similar requirements for defense contractors. Due to the flexibility of the solution, similar applications will be displayed in other fields with cyber-physical systems such as in aerospace and industrial control systems. However, presently, all key details of the scanned data are manually entered into a spreadsheet-based tool, known as the Pier Reconnaissance Assessment Tool PRAT , for facility repair planning and detailed repair instructions.

This manual data entry is a laborious human-in-the-loop bottleneck and is an opportunity for significant PDR improvement. The methods employed to achieve this end are believed to have commercial value. This SBIR topic seeks to prototype the automation of gross-defect and battle damage detection from structure scan 3D point-clouds, SLAM technologies, photogrammetry, and SfM data types , defect identification, defect volume approximation, defect location, and defect tabular summation.

All ROM estimates may be nominally approximated from conventional construction, as some military-specific solutions are still in development and such military-specific information is considered out of scope for proposers to this SBIR topic. Common pier construction types to be considered include cast reinforced concrete, pre-stressed concrete, steel, and timber construction listed in the order of importance, with emphasis on cast reinforced concrete construction. This SBIR topic does not address generation of repair instruction, plans, specifications, etc.

Current methods for converting 3D point-cloud data into Building Information Modeling BIM , or for inventorying of scanned city streets, as applied to waterfront structures fall short since they rely on libraries of standardized pre-modelled mechanical components.

However, with the construction of piers and wharves, while there are common construction techniques and configurations per material type, there is notable variability within even a single structure, i. Therefore, innovation is needed to post-process 3D scan data, delivering volumetric construction details and patterns on the existing and missing component s , while allowing for original structural variability i.

However, in the subject case, the user is assumed to not have access to pre-event scan data. Increases in the level of required human interaction for this step will proportionally lower the overall satisfaction in the resulting solutions s. It is desired to reduce the time or labor equivalent required between obtaining of scan data to the completion of the BDA tabular data entry by a factor of between half satisfactory and three quarters excellent reduction. This SBIR topic seeks solutions that will work equally well for structure scan data sets from either listed in order of preference : 1.

SLAM technologies, 3. Photogrammetry, and 4. SfM technologies. Proposed solutions that do not address all these listed technologies will receive proportionally less consideration. This SBIR topic seeks solutions which can be executed in the field, without reliable Wi-Fi connectivity; therefore, are not cloud-based or require high computing capability.

This topic also seeks solutions that utilize open standard data interfaces and enables interoperability between IT systems. Once the gross defects and BDA are tabulated, with ROM repair volumes and times summarized, the requirements of this topic will be satisfied. Within this requirement, separately determine the technical feasibility of: a Post-processing 3D scan data, delivering volumetric detail and construction patterns on the existing and potentially missing component s , while allowing for constructed variability.

For proposal purposes, assume a concrete-constructed pier approximately ft. Limited proof of concept for custom integration is also acceptable in Phase I, but is not required. PHASE II: Develop a prototype of custom solutions or integration that enables post-processing of 3D scan data of an idealized structure s and idealized damage scenario s. Note: Single construction type for reinforced concrete is acceptable for Phase II. HF communications via ionospheric reflection is a commonly used technique; unfortunately, HF communications are complex due to the constantly changing ionosphere.

Ionospheric sounding is a technique used to provide real-time ionospheric data that is vital for HF communications. With the addition of forecasted data, it can effectively predict the optimal channels for communications.

The solution, expected to be fully automated, will ingest ionospheric and propagation information to actively and dynamically provide frequency plans; and will provide resilient and reliable communications in the tactical environment, which is key to the successful completion of missions of the U.

Navy, Joint, and Coalition forces. Work produced in Phase II may become classified. Note: The prospective contractor s must be U. The selected contractor must be able to acquire and maintain a secret level facility and Personnel Security Clearances, in order to perform on advanced phases of this project as set forth by DCSA and NAVWAR in order to gain access to classified information pertaining to the national defense of the United States and its allies; this will be an inherent requirement.

PHASE I: Define the automated HF communications planning tool architecture that will optimize HF channel selection based on real-time ionospheric and propagation information, as well as prediction data; and enable monitoring and control of local and distant radios.

Determine the feasibility of the tool architecture. Develop the prototype system for demonstration and validation in BRSE or an equivalent development environment. Develop the life-cycle support strategies and concepts for the system. It is probable that the work under this effort will be classified under Phase II see Description section for details. Investigate the dual use of the developed technologies for commercial applications such as Global Maritime Distress and Safety System GMDSS communications or other users that employ maritime sea-to-shore and ship-to-ship services.

The substrates should consist of nanostructured metals, preferably gold or silver, on a porous or non-porous material backing such as filter paper, silicon, gallium nitride, etc. Military and Homeland Security agencies commonly utilize various portable Raman systems in sensitive site exploitation, checkpoint scenarios, and to determine hazardous content on surfaces or containers.

Enhanced Raman techniques, such as surface-enhanced Raman scattering SERS have been demonstrated to be a vibrant field of research that is growing significantly in scope and applicability while pushing at the ultimate limits of sensitivity. Along with other advantages such as reduction of interfering fluorescence, decreased detection times, and reduction of laser power required for analysis, SERS has been positioned to be an ideal technique for low-level, low-consumable detection schemes, while aiming towards miniaturization of instrumentation.

The problem to date, however, is the lack of commercially available robust SERS active substrates that have an inherent low background signature which ultimately interferes with obtaining clean SERS spectra from low-level concentrations of threat analytes, while still having at least SERS enhancement.

The goal of this topic and the resulting research is to develop miniature metal-based surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates which could be manufactured at a large scale, while retaining both low-level baseline signatures native background peaks are minimal and low contaminant levels, to be utilized in various chemical and biological detection scenarios for augmentation of portable Raman technologies.

PHASE I: Develop a conceptual design for the surface-enhanced Raman substrate detailing the technical feasibility of the proposed design and production of the substrate. Technical feasibility shall be demonstrated through modelling, production capability infrastructure, proposed optimal nm or nm and non-optimal wavelength nm use, and theoretical shelf-life.

This demonstration will elucidate the minimal SERS background spectral features when exposed to clean de-ionized water for a minimum of 10 minutes. The demonstration will also provide an estimated SERS enhancement value to be equal to or greater than Use of 1,2-bis 4-pyridyl -ethylene to determine the SERS enhancement value is encouraged.

Demonstration of technical feasibility in Phase I is required for consideration of a Phase II project award. PHASE II: Following technical feasibility demonstration of the Phase I requirements, the small business shall develop manufacturing protocols for the design and delivery of substrates after 10 months, and SERS substrates after 24 months, meeting the goals of a or better enhancement with native surface background Raman features with no analyte present not exceeding 3 times the background noise level with the same laser power and integration time with which a SERS Raman spectrum is obtained.

The purposes of a low native surface background are both to reduce spectral interference and to maintain the maximum number of possible available binding sites for user introduced analytes. The substrates will be tested by U. PHASE III: Following successful delivery of SERS substrates meeting the performance characteristics in Phase II, protocols for scale-up manufacturing will be developed in order to deliver thousands of substrates which can be utilized in various chemical and biological detection applications for the augmentation of field portable Raman spectroscopy systems.

In addition, packaging for shipment will be developed with the goal of protecting the substrates and minimizing additional contamination. DoD uses could include sensitive site exploitation, explosives detection, post decontamination survey and verification, and may serve as a technology upgrade for current and future portable Raman spectroscopic technologies. Emmons, E. Tripathi, A.

Guicheteau, J. Faraday Discuss. A, Farell, M. The goal is to develop an advanced composite detector fashioned from metamaterials that can be assembled into compact arrays for low cost hyperspectral and high sensitivity W-band imaging applications. W-band 75 to GHz imagers have proven to be particularly useful to the military for the detection of threats. Electromagnetic metamaterials have demonstrated the ability to provide frequency dependent high absorptivity at millimeter wavelengths, and a W-band detector with optical read-out has been demonstrated.

A common metamaterial absorber design uses a metal ground plane, dielectric layer, and a top layer of patterned metal. The metamaterial detectors use thin film pyroelectric materials as the dielectric spacer, thus enabling high absorptivity, and direct read-out of the detected signal. Metamaterial enhanced bimaterial cantilever pixels have been demonstrated for far-infrared detection. At least two types of metamaterial detector structures may be considered for millimeter wave imaging applications: 1 symmetric metamaterial absorbers SMA for coherent amplitude and phase detection, and 2 asymmetric or ground plane metamaterial absorbers GPA , for intensity-only detection.

While both SMA and GPA structures can be used for hyperspectral sensing, the coherent SMA structure provides phase sensitive, vector mode, sensing capabilities that are especially important in millimeter wave imaging applications. A W-Band imager should be able to detect objects at a distance of at least 10 meters and possess a noise equivalent temperature difference NETD of 5 degrees Kelvin K or less. The imager should be able to detect targets with a resolution of 10 cm or better at a distance of 10 meters.

Demonstrate that the system can detect a NEDT of 5 degrees or less. Explore the use of a coherent structure that provides phase sensitive, vector mode, sensing capabilities.

Develop a design of an imager operating in the W-Band that can detect objects to at least a distance of 10 meters with a resolution of 10 cm or better with a NEDT of 5 degrees K or less. Demonstrate the imager using targets and black bodies at a distance of 10 meters or more. Demonstrate that the system can detect objects to at least a distance of 10 meters with a resolution of 10 cm or better with a NETD of 5 degrees K or less.

Deliver the working prototype to the Government for further testing. Design modifications based on results from tests conducted using the Phase II deliverable will be incorporated into the system. Manufacturability specific to U. Singh, K. Korolev, M. Afsar, S. Tao, E. Kadlec, A. Strikwerda, K. Fan, W. Padilla, R. Averitt, E. Shaner, X. Suen, K. Fan, J.

Montoya, C. Bingham, V. Stenger, S. Sriram, W. Du Bosq, J. Lopez-Alonso, G. Boreman, D. The Broad Arrow is the oldest and most common mark of British government property. No Savage Lee-Enfields were ever issued to the US military; the markings existed solely to maintain the pretence that American equipment wasLee-Enfield is very easy to understand.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. War had progressed to close combat, and the long range shooting of the old days was gone. Lewis Gun. It's easier than you think. Serial number on let side of band with on-matching magazine. Highwood Classic Arms. Threads used on Lee Enfield rifles. Lee Enfield MK1 Numero 4. An android representing the Lee-Enfield bolt-action rifle in Girls Frontline. Barrel is hence serial number does not match the receiver, nor does the bolt.

Some of the Indian-made weapons can be found using 7. True to form, the gun is crafted from real wood and is a proud representation of the rifle fielded by the British Army back in the days of WWII.

The result was the. WW1 Lee Enfield No. Price: , The ZF is a local armourer marking indicating that the location of the stamp is damaged beyond local repair and is to be sent back to factory.

Propresenter 6 mac keygen. The Lee-Enfield No. The Lee-Enfield bolt-action, magazine-fed, repeating rifle was the main firearm used by the military forces of the British Empire and Commonwealth during the first half of the 20th century. Related:lee enfield bayonet lee enfield chamber cover. But as linguist N. Australian troops were still armed with the SMLE through Korea, and the SMLE rifle itself stayed in production In the United Kingdom, the Lee-Enfield rifles were the standard infantry rifle of the British Army from to , when they were replaced by the L1A1 SLR; even after being phased out, they were still used as a secondary infantry rifle for reserve forces, and a 7.

Need a British jungle carbine scope mount We have them in stock for sale at low prices. Make: Lee Enfield: Model: S. This specimen has typical markings associated with that program. Depending on the type of rifle it will either be on the left or most commonly the right side of the buttsocket under the bolt knob.

Manual Download. III military version. The simplest way to identify any particular government contracted Lee-Enfield up to the No1 MkVI is by its buttsocket markings. As the title indicates, I would like to have more info on a sporter Enfield I just got. Licensed From - Lee Kerslake. Lee Enfield Series. Royal Enfield - We have been creating modern classics since The weights given do not include the bayonet.

Outdoor Hunting Equipment. Dry firing and field strippable. First debuted in November as the. Because Korth revolvers are known worldwide for their unmatched quality, the partnership between Nighthawk Custom and Korth is a perfect fit.

Click for the exploded view of the Undercover Revolver. We also carry all the gun accessories and supplies that you need to make your shoot a success. It was initially built on the short I-frame and then changed to the J-frame in the cylinder length went from 1.

I would suggest a less hasty conclusion. Low recoil. Therefore, any 32 Magnum revolver will also accept and fire both the. Made in the USA during the 's this little revolver will be at home on the range, or around the farm! Taurus 6. As compared to regular revolvers, snub-nose revolvers can deliver the. Item Number: The Beretta M is a good example of this.

That is that the hammer on a DAO revolver lacks the latch that locks that hammer back. Hamilton Bowen has recently released a new fixed sight for small revolvers—a giant step forward in enhancing the performance of these guns.

While many people carry a revolver for personal protection, primarily a. Bore has strong rifling with pitting. You may never have considered a. The gun has a snubby barrel and a 6 shot cylinder. Not transferable to civilian residents of California, District of Colombia, or Massachusetts. It would indeed be very interesting if someone made either a 9mm or magnum as a 5 shot I frame. Back in the late s there was a class of small 22 revolvers that sold for about a buck. Unanswered Questions.

Built with solid steel sidewalls for robust durability, the Ruger SP for sale is a revolver that goes beyond the norm in form and function. The Taurus 6. Online Only. The Model was offered in three calibers, which lent them three unofficial names:.

Not just that, but the smaller scale makes things a little easier to hide. Market Price: 9. By far the most popular cartridge for concealed carry revolvers is the. To help control recoil, the revolver has a six-vent ported barrel and rubber combat style grips. It would have to be designed around Ruger's snub-nose revolver platform: the solidly-built SP And that's at a gun range. All items sold by Black Market Arms are new manufacturer original products.

Another advantage of the Ultra-Lite. Even so, it greatly exceeds the power of the. Unless noted as used. Most see it as an urban gun, something to hide under the suit in the dangerous streets of the big cities. Unlike the earlier Remington cartridge designs, both could easily be converted back to percussion pistols by changing cylinders, thus providing greater versatility than Colt models, which, once converted, could not be The Downsides of the Snubby Revolver, by David Tong.

The Charter Undercoverette shoots the. Uses a gram CO2 cartridge. What's more, the Charter is better when it comes to being portable and has top-notch precision. Typical snub-nose revolvers are compact, five or six-shot pistols with a barrel length of 2 inches or less. One of these I don't have anymore though.

Let us help you get exactly what you need from your firearm. Rimfire Rifle. AR Customization. Showing all 9 results. Contrary to what popular media would have you believe, the AR in their names stands for Armalite Rifle, not assault rifle, and both of these firearms owe their creation to the Armalite company. It is ultra-compact, perfectly balanced, intuitively ergonomic, easily concealable, and fast to deploy. From hunting to long range precision, or even compliance within heavily regulated states, the Uintah Precision UPR can fill all roles.

We also manufacture a large variety of weapons accessoriess - mounts, forends, sling swivels, sights, trigger mechanisms, etc. Build Kits. Complete AR Cleaning Kits. If you would like us to email you when it is back in stock, send along your email address Email Address: AR Restricted State Products. The AR10, as a predecessor of AR, offers you more power due to the bigger size of the caliber. Fits All. RF The R. US Military Manual Collection. If you think adding an. Ar platform, MR Complete Lower Assemblies.

Aero M5E1. As far as an AR rifle, this I will say is the best elaborate weapons system I have run across as of today…the machine work and design with dual operation components are outstanding. Rifle Parts. In this easy to follow guide, we'll walk you through all the parts you'll need to complete your first Whether you're building a precision long-range rifle or a basic range gun this guide will help you select the parts you need for your first build.

Compare Products. American Made Tactical offers the lowest prices for 80 lower receivers, AR parts, AR parts, and jig kits to complete your custom AR rifle builds. Stripped Lowers.

Car Repair Tools. Feb Refine by No filters applied keep in touch. Air Control System. Sign Up now for email offers and more news! Tactical Rifles. You supply the rail and furniture, making the rifle truly yours. CBC AR rifle kits present you with an opportunity to acquire an AR rifle at a discounted price by enabling you to take on the assembly process yourself. Common AR calibers include.

Wireless Devices. Lower receiver not included. Let us help you with parts or custom builds. Flag images indicative of country of origin andRifle AR Enjoy great savings when you buy AR10 and AR. Here's our list of the best AR models. Your one-stop shop for everything AR!